Author: pavel
Date: 19:35:20 02/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2002 at 22:08:56, Tina Long wrote: >On February 01, 2002 at 21:39:41, pavel wrote: > >>crafty-1 home 2002 >> >> >>1 Crafty 17.14 2500 +85 34.5/56 >>2 Crafty 17.11 2500 +72 33.5/56 >>3 Crafty 18.11 2500 +65 33.0/56 918.00 >>4 Crafty 18.12 2500 +65 33.0/56 887.00 >>5 Crafty 18.01 2500 +58 32.5/56 >>6 Crafty 17.02 2500 +45 31.5/56 847.75 >>7 Crafty 18.13 2500 +45 31.5/56 847.50 >>8 Crafty 18.10 2500 +45 31.5/56 846.00 >>9 Crafty 17.01 2500 +39 31.0/56 855.50 >>10 Crafty 18.03 2500 +39 31.0/56 849.75 >.... > >Keeping in mind the "worth" of these results: > >Good work Pavel, a very interesting tournament & I hope Jonas does follow up on >this (I would suggest he use your rankings 1,2,4,5,6,7, against whatever he >likes - JMO) > >I wonder now, when I quoted 17.16 as the best recently, if I had recalled >wrongly & meant 17.14 (particularly as 17.16 doesn't exist) > >Anyway, Until I see Jonas' results I'm moving my 18.13 aside & installing 17.14. > >Incidently: http://www.chessbase.de./download/index.asp?cat=Engines > >"Search in this category" >Search for Crafty, & http://www.chessbase.de./download/searchresult.asp >gives all the Comets Craftys & the Bam Bam. > >Keep it up & please keep us informed, > >Tina I don't know for sure, how much you can trust this score, but it can't be way off-hand since this has been discussed (or tested) several times before that these versions (17.14/17.11) are strong(er). Anyways, I am interested on Jonas test because, it will be on differant platform, with ponder=on,and differant time control and with differant enignes. Summing it all up, it should be interesting for crafty fans. :) But again (if I know people over here well enough), someone will come up with tossing coins and try to prove that he is a good statistician (and riduculously relating that to chess), other will come with "ifs" and "buts" and "mores" and "duhs" ;). Oh, and ofcourse another good conclution could be that the latest crafty versions are tweaked for humans and does not play as good against comps.... da-da. pavs ;)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.