Author: pavel
Date: 20:12:27 02/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2002 at 22:45:55, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 01, 2002 at 22:35:20, pavel wrote: > >>On February 01, 2002 at 22:08:56, Tina Long wrote: >> >>>On February 01, 2002 at 21:39:41, pavel wrote: >>> >>>>crafty-1 home 2002 >>>> >>>> >>>>1 Crafty 17.14 2500 +85 34.5/56 >>>>2 Crafty 17.11 2500 +72 33.5/56 >>>>3 Crafty 18.11 2500 +65 33.0/56 918.00 >>>>4 Crafty 18.12 2500 +65 33.0/56 887.00 >>>>5 Crafty 18.01 2500 +58 32.5/56 >>>>6 Crafty 17.02 2500 +45 31.5/56 847.75 >>>>7 Crafty 18.13 2500 +45 31.5/56 847.50 >>>>8 Crafty 18.10 2500 +45 31.5/56 846.00 >>>>9 Crafty 17.01 2500 +39 31.0/56 855.50 >>>>10 Crafty 18.03 2500 +39 31.0/56 849.75 >>>.... >>> >>>Keeping in mind the "worth" of these results: >>> >>>Good work Pavel, a very interesting tournament & I hope Jonas does follow up on >>>this (I would suggest he use your rankings 1,2,4,5,6,7, against whatever he >>>likes - JMO) >>> >>>I wonder now, when I quoted 17.16 as the best recently, if I had recalled >>>wrongly & meant 17.14 (particularly as 17.16 doesn't exist) >>> >>>Anyway, Until I see Jonas' results I'm moving my 18.13 aside & installing 17.14. >>> >>>Incidently: http://www.chessbase.de./download/index.asp?cat=Engines >>> >>>"Search in this category" >>>Search for Crafty, & http://www.chessbase.de./download/searchresult.asp >>>gives all the Comets Craftys & the Bam Bam. >>> >>>Keep it up & please keep us informed, >>> >>>Tina >> >> >>I don't know for sure, how much you can trust this score, but it can't be way >>off-hand since this has been discussed (or tested) several times before that >>these versions (17.14/17.11) are strong(er). >> >>Anyways, I am interested on Jonas test because, it will be on differant >>platform, with ponder=on,and differant time control and with differant enignes. >> >>Summing it all up, it should be interesting for crafty fans. :) >> >>But again (if I know people over here well enough), someone will come up with >>tossing coins and try to prove that he is a good statistician (and riduculously >>relating that to chess), other will come with "ifs" and "buts" and "mores" and >>"duhs" ;). >> >>Oh, and ofcourse another good conclution could be that the latest crafty >>versions are tweaked for humans and does not play as good against comps.... > >The number 1 entrant in the best crafty sweepstakes: >>>>1 Crafty 17.14 2500 +85 34.5/56 > >The number 7 entrant in the best crafty sweepstakes (current version): >>>>7 Crafty 18.13 2500 +45 31.5/56 847.50 > >Notice that #7 scored 31.5/56 and number 1 scored 34.5/56. There is absolutely >no statistical significance to that result. A whopping 3 more points in 56 >games. I could volunteer to run a set of 1000 games between crafty 18.13/17.14/ and another chess program. I can assure you that it will be the same :) pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.