Author: pavel
Date: 14:31:08 02/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2002 at 08:11:29, Chessfun wrote: >On February 02, 2002 at 00:33:47, pavel wrote: > >>On February 02, 2002 at 00:20:17, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On February 02, 2002 at 00:15:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On February 01, 2002 at 23:12:27, pavel wrote: >>>>[snip] >>>>>I could volunteer to run a set of 1000 games between crafty 18.13/17.14/ and >>>>>another chess program. I can assure you that it will be the same :) >>>> >>>>What gives you this confidence? >>>>You are mistaken. >>> >>>Allow me to clarify. The rato will be higher or smaller. The odds of the ratio >>>being exactly the same are very close to zero. >>> >>>Run the *exact* same contest that you just ran, and a large number of the >>>programs will trade places. >> >>same as in crafty17.14 will perform better than crafty 18.13, when it comes to >>comp-comp games. >> >>If i run the exact same contest it wont be the same. I know that. >>Maybe because we are talking about 28 versions of the same engine. >>Evn though I believe that the version that was on last will stay there >>crafty17.14/12 will share the first second place. > >We'll soon see, as currently I'm running the exact same match. >All 29 engs 5 mins game, ponder=off, NO Tbs, 2600.ctg, 812 games. I hope it is the same ;) atleast the first 2 position as I said (crafty17.14/12) > >>as you said it's intuition. >>;) > >Only women have that, and mine says you're wrong ;-) Really? I didn't know that, but again how would I know? :) We will see, it should be very intersting (atleast to me) nevertheless. pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.