Author: Chessfun
Date: 15:42:04 02/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2002 at 17:31:08, pavel wrote: >On February 02, 2002 at 08:11:29, Chessfun wrote: > >>On February 02, 2002 at 00:33:47, pavel wrote: >> >>>On February 02, 2002 at 00:20:17, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On February 02, 2002 at 00:15:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 01, 2002 at 23:12:27, pavel wrote: >>>>>[snip] >>>>>>I could volunteer to run a set of 1000 games between crafty 18.13/17.14/ and >>>>>>another chess program. I can assure you that it will be the same :) >>>>> >>>>>What gives you this confidence? >>>>>You are mistaken. >>>> >>>>Allow me to clarify. The rato will be higher or smaller. The odds of the ratio >>>>being exactly the same are very close to zero. >>>> >>>>Run the *exact* same contest that you just ran, and a large number of the >>>>programs will trade places. >>> >>>same as in crafty17.14 will perform better than crafty 18.13, when it comes to >>>comp-comp games. >>> >>>If i run the exact same contest it wont be the same. I know that. >>>Maybe because we are talking about 28 versions of the same engine. >>>Evn though I believe that the version that was on last will stay there >>>crafty17.14/12 will share the first second place. >> >>We'll soon see, as currently I'm running the exact same match. >>All 29 engs 5 mins game, ponder=off, NO Tbs, 2600.ctg, 812 games. > > >I hope it is the same ;) >atleast the first 2 position as I said (crafty17.14/12) This is what I doubted. That two crafty vesions engines out of 29 would 2 out of 2, finish 1 and 2. Especially over so few games each. Currently 17.14 and 17.11 are in 19th and 21st place but have only played 7 games each. One difference however, is that although use tablebases was unticked, all the versions seem to be using them. Sarah. >> >>>as you said it's intuition. >>>;) >> >>Only women have that, and mine says you're wrong ;-) > > >Really? I didn't know that, but again how would I know? >:) >We will see, it should be very intersting (atleast to me) nevertheless. > >pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.