Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 04:02:33 02/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2002 at 23:12:08, leonid wrote: > >Probably you are right. The only sure advantage is that no missing mate will be >ever lost in any game. > >Leonid. > I must admit I was never interested in mate solving. But some days ago I decided to try one of your positions with many pieces. My program was stuck on ply 2 so I turned of the Q-search and a lot of other things and returned 0 as evaluation if no mate was found. I still don't think I was close to solve it in reasonable time (got to 8 or 9 plies I think in 5 mins). There are obviously some things to learn when it comes to solving these kind of positions, and maybe these considerations can be of value in an ordinary positions. Well, so much to do, so little time... Ralf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.