Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 10:51:57 02/03/02
I had a confirmation of the importance of tactics (especially for class level players) reading the article by Michael De La Maza in ChessCafe.com, titled "400 (elo) points in 400 days". You can have a complete look to it at http://www.chesscafe.com/text/skittles148.pdf , but I would like to report an excerpt very enlightening, IMHO ,here following: "Here are some other reasons to focus on studying tactics: Tactical shots are easier to analyze. Suppose that you are reading a book that discusses a position in which positional factors, not tactical ones, are the over-riding concern. If you have a question about a variation that is not covered in the book, what can you do? Not much, unless you have a chess coach who is willing to answer questions ad nauseum. In contrast, you can receive GM-level tactical analysis by using a computer and can fully understand every variation. There is an amusing experiment that you can try in order to verify the difficulty of understanding positional evaluations. Pick any analyzed position in Jeremy Silman’s Reassess Your Chess, the book that has become famous for teaching class players positional concepts, set up the position on your favorite computer program, and play the side that is winning according to Silman. After a few moves the computer will deviate from Silman’s analysis. Feel free to check Silman’s book or any other source for advice on what to do about the computer’s "new idea." You will quickly learn that the computer has *busted* Silman’s plan and a new plan is required. Now what do you do? If you are a GM you can create a new plan (provided that you didn’t reject Silman’s plan from the start), but if you are a class player there is little that you can easily do to learn about the new position." w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.