Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: is there any chess program supporting fischere-random-chess

Author: Mike S.

Date: 17:22:51 02/03/02

Go up one level in this thread


On February 03, 2002 at 19:02:06, Gordon Rattray wrote:

>(...)
>My opinion is based on the fact that I don't think it is unreasonable for a
>programmer to rely on an opening book.  The same applies to endgame tablebases.
>I accept that other people are interested in a program's performance without
>such pre-computed knowledge.  That's fair enough, but I myself don't view it as
>being unfair or false.

Yes, I also don't think this is unfair at all. It's very reasonable to include
(human) opening knowledge that way, which offers opening play at high level for
the user and tries to provide the achieveable maximum of strength during the
opening for the program. I think though, the doubt in too large books generated
from databases, is very common. These books are probably 90% practise book, not
theory books. Since the programs have become so strong nowadays, I assume that
they could improve a lot of the lines they are forced to play from the book, at
least at longer time controls, or play alternatives which fit their style
better. But these are only guesses.

Also, the advantage of using endgame databases is obvious - although here there
are some practical problems (i.e. slowdown effect when accessed during the
search, missing knowledge if user doesn't install tablebases). I have seen
improvement in tbs use lately, i.e. some programs avoid the incomplete problem,
some progs use evaluation tricks in addition to the database evals to avoid
"ugly" waste of material (which doesn't matter against a program, but may miss
defence chances against imperfectly playing humans).

I won't repeat my usual remark of the old Mchess idea (to make database useage
more flexible), because nobody except me seems to be interested in that anymore.

The baseline of my opinion is: Databases are useful and perfectly ok, as long as
attention is paid to possible problems (and to avoid them as good as possible),
and as long as it is kept in mind what the average user wants (and not only what
will bring maximum comp-comp performance).

Regards,
M.Scheidl



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.