Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 06:08:49 02/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2002 at 08:20:27, Aaron Tay wrote: >On February 04, 2002 at 08:00:47, Jason Williamson wrote: > >>Just curious as to why so few engines have implemented the UCI interface, is it >>quite difficult to do? > >Support the UCI protocol? Mainly because there wasn't demand for that probably. >Before Fritz 7 and now Arena, very few users had UCI capable interfaces, except >the Chess assistant 6 people and the few owners of Shredder 5. Hardly worth the >borther IMHO. > >No idea how difficult it is, but i suppose it would depend on the indidvual >program.. > >I predict a lot more to come..But I doubt all or even 50% of winboard engines >will start to support UCI.. > >>Yace and Pharaon seems to do it quite well. > >Pharaon was actually meant to be sold by Gambitsoft, together with other UCI >engines (anmon, etc) , but the project did not take off.. In fact, most of the >UCI versions you see floating around now, are mostly associated with this >project.. And what about the other engines in the Gabitsoft package that died? Anyone know if they will be released in some form or other (Like Patzer, Capture and Lampchop...)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.