Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 11:08:55 02/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2002 at 11:39:53, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On February 05, 2002 at 06:51:24, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>On February 04, 2002 at 16:04:52, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >> >>>However, the Russian school had their methods for teaching kids and we >>>have seen the results. >> >>What does this last sentence mean? >> >>/David > >I do not know what is exactly what part I was not clear, so I will rephrase. >The sentence should be connected to the paragraph before. > >Iwrote >"I understand. Chess books have always centered around "chess" and not around >the "players". The books that might come close to what you want could >be "Training for the tournament player" by Dvoretsky et al. >"Improve your Chess Now!" By J. Tisdall and a little less "Secrets of >Practical Chess" by J. Nunn..." > >So I rephrase it >"However, the Russian school had their methods for teaching kids and we >have seen the results. They taught thinking about the training of the players >and not only chess. A little bit about his methods can be peeked on Dvoretsky's >books. Their success tells me that the correct way is teaching how to train >rather than teaching chess by itself, which is what you were asking for." > >I hope it is clearer. At least is longer :-) > >Miguel Well, this is how I understood it the first time, but I was unsure if you were being ironic :) /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.