Author: blass uri
Date: 07:42:23 06/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 1998 at 10:11:42, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 24, 1998 at 10:00:16, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On June 24, 1998 at 03:08:55, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On June 24, 1998 at 01:53:44, blass uri wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Junior4.6 on pentium 200MMX find Bh6 after more than 8 hours with >>>>evaluation -0.18 Depth 19 >>>>line 1.Bh6 a6 2.Bxd7+ Qxd7 3.Bg7 Rg8 4.Qxh7 Rxg7 5.Qxg7 Bf6 6.Qg8+ >>>>Ke7 7.Nxe6 Rxg8 8.Nec5+ Kd8 9.Nxd7 Kxd7 10.Nc5+ >>>> >>>>an interesing alternative is 1.Nxe6 >>>> >>>>Uri >>>in ply 19 Nxe6 fails high and Junior's evaluation is -0.07 after almost 10 >>>hours. >>> >>>Uri >>after more than 15 hours (ply 19) Junior's evaluation is 1.65 >>with the line 1.Nxe6 fxe6 2.Qxe6 Rc2 3.Bg5 Rc7 4.Rad1 Kf8 >>5.Bh6+ Ke8 6.Bg7 Rf8 7.Bxf8 Kxf8 8.Rxd5 Bxd5 9.Qxd5 >> >>Uri > > >this looks like a quicker way to suicide. A piece for 3 pawns can work, if >the three pawns areon one side of the board, and passed. Here, that's not >the case, and it seems to me that black's extra piece is going to be a problem, >as white is not threatening a pawn-roll on either side of the board... > >speculation is good, but self-immolation is not... This line is not 3 pawns for a piece. I think Junior rejected 2...a6 for some tactical reason(1.65 value cannot be 3 pawns for a piece). I will try to see why Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.