Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:04:48 02/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2002 at 17:03:01, Jorge wrote: >On February 05, 2002 at 22:23:26, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On February 05, 2002 at 15:59:21, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 05, 2002 at 15:50:02, Jorge wrote: >>> >>>>Why do you use Less hash table size for GT2? It may make a difference in the >>>>results. >>>> >>>>cheers, >>>>jorge >>> >>>It is known that doubling the hash tables is responsible for 6-7 elo >>>improvement. >>> >>>The difference between 64 and 48 is not significant and he cannot use exactly 64 >>>mbytes for gambittiger because gambittiger can use only 48 or 96 mbytes and not >>>something between them. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>same for my program. simplifies addressing... > >But in a Chessbase Gui (Fritz, Junior, etc), you can adjust the hash table size >for Crafty. I would have liked to see the same table size for GT2, even though >you can't adjust it to 64Mb for GT2, as Uri said- you can adjust it for Crafty. > >jorge All I can say is that if the GUI allows you to set it to 64, crafty won't use 64. It is _impossible_. It will use 48 only. I suspect that if 64 was used for crafty and 48 for tiger, they both used 48 because I know my code can't possibly use 64.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.