Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:35:45 02/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2002 at 19:20:45, Heiner Marxen wrote: >On February 06, 2002 at 18:52:09, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On February 06, 2002 at 18:40:22, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >>>perft 5 >>>depth 0: leaves: 1 accum: 1 >>>depth 1: leaves: 131 accum: 132 >>>depth 2: leaves: 200 accum: 332 >>>depth 3: leaves: 26160 accum: 26492 >>>depth 4: leaves: 15031 accum: 41523 >>>depth 5: leaves: 1928938 accum: 1970461 >>>seconds: 8.35 nps: 235926.83 >> >>Beowulf says: >>[1]W > perft 5 >>Progress : >>................................................................................................................................. >>.. >>Total: 1928938 Moves >>0.80 Seconds >> >>Crafty says: >>White(1): setboard 4k3/Q3p1Q1/1Q5B/Q1QN1NQ1/4QQ2/B2Q4/8/2R1KR2 w - - >>White(1): perft 5 >>total moves=1928938 time=1.10 >> >>The number looks good. > >Chest says: > >W: Ke1 Qa5 Qa7 Qb6 Qc5 Qd3 Qe4 Qf4 Qg5 Qg7 Rc1 Rf1 Ba3 Bh6 Nd5 Nf5 (16) >B: Ke8 Pe7 (2) >FEN: 4k3/Q3p1Q1/1Q5B/Q1QN1NQ1/4QQ2/B2Q4/8/2R1KR2 w - - >Counting width of legal tree, 5 plies deep... >Time (user) = 0.39 sec >dep #nodes quot sum nodes > 0 1 [ 0.000] 1 > 1 131 [131.000] 132 > 2 200 [ 1.527] 332 > 3 26160 [130.800] 26492 > 4 15031 [ 0.575] 41523 > 5 1928938 [128.331] 1970461 > >(On an Athlon/600) >So we all agree :-) > >Cheers, >Heiner My program also agree with the number except the time. It says 0.27 seconds some other results(I hope that they are correct): perft(6)=1114923 6.058 seconds perft(7)=139327522 18.627 seconds perft(8)=113197588 439.352 seconds Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.