Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 09:01:48 02/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
Is is safe, statistically, to conclude that Gandalf 5 is not significantly stronger than Gandalf 4.32g/h at these time controls? On February 07, 2002 at 07:51:47, J.Dufek wrote: >All WB engines. > >Summary table (combimed levels): > 1.Gandalf 4.32h |xxxxx|104,0|106,0|104,5| 314,5/600 > 2.Gandalf 4.32g | 96,0|xxxxx| 99,0|117,0| 312.0/600 > 3.Gandalf 5 | 94,0|101,0|xxxxx|104,0| 299.0/600 > 4.Gandalf 4.32f | 95,5| 83,0| 96,0|xxxxx| 274.5/600 >
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.