Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 09:46:29 02/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2002 at 12:01:48, Roy Eassa wrote: >Is is safe, statistically, to conclude that Gandalf 5 is not significantly >stronger than Gandalf 4.32g/h at these time controls? > I would say no, since it only "proves" that G5 did not do well against itself :) Now i would like to see G5 in a pool of other programs and after that G432 in the same pool, that way there might be a way of finding out. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.