Author: pavel
Date: 20:40:55 02/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2002 at 18:04:59, Ed Schröder wrote: >On February 07, 2002 at 15:54:47, Slater Wold wrote: > >>I have always been intrigued by the Crafty vs Rebel NPS challenge. Always >>thought it was a shame that we never got to see an end result. >> >>With that said......... >> >>I would like to continue the experiment. Crafty of today vs any top commercial >>program out there. >> >>What/Who I am looking for: >> >>1.) Someone who can play at LEAST 25 of these games. I will take Crafty, so I >>will have the one with the tied up machine. You will only be required to >>analyze a move for 3:30 minutes, every 8 hours or so. And e-mail the move, and >>the eval to me. >> >>2.) Someone with up-to-date hardware and software. 1.5Ghz+ only. NEW software >>only. Fritz 7, Junior 7, Gandalf 5.0, Rebel 4, CT 14.0, GT 2.0, etc. I don't >>care if it's SMP. And I don't care which program. >> >>Match conditions: >> >>1.) New software gets 3:30 minutes a move. No PB. TB's are fine. >>2.) DBII hit, on average, 42B nodes in 3:30 minutes. The latest version of >>Crafty on my computer (Dual AMD 1.6GHz) gets 1.53M nodes a second average >>(average of 30 positions for 3:30 minutes). Therefore, Crafty will get 7.5 >>hours a move. (Approx. to the 42B node average.) Neither computer will be able >>to utilize pondering. >> >>If you're interested, e-mail me. If you have any ideas, e-mail me or respond >>here. >> >>Bob, if you could change Crafty to use 64 bit intergers, that would be nice. >>Cause 7.5 hours is going to roll that node counter over a few thousand times. >>;) >> >>Ed and Bob, I'd love to hear your feedback. :) > > >Slater, that's all fine and exciting. It allows Bob to have his ultimate revenge >after 5 years. So I applaude to the idea, I have only no time to maintain a >daily updated page. So if you find somebody who is willing to do the HTML job I >will provide you with a copy of Rebel Century 4. > >-> The Crafty-Rebel NPS Re-match > >Yes, I like definitely it. > >Ed I personally don't understand how this test is interesting and point is it trying to prove? pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.