Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rebel's anti-GM option(Junior:

Author: blass uri

Date: 14:11:42 06/24/98

Go up one level in this thread



On June 24, 1998 at 16:29:54, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>
>On June 24, 1998 at 10:42:23, blass uri wrote:
>
>>This line is not 3 pawns for a piece.
>>I think Junior rejected 2...a6 for some tactical reason(1.65 value cannot be
>>3 pawns for a piece).
>>I will try to see why
>
>Mine has been going on this for a few hours on an alpha, and it thinks 2. ... a6
>is fine.  It could be wrong, of course, but I would like to see a line.
>
>bruce
I gave Junior to analyze the position after 2...a6 for some hours and
the evaluation was -0.37 at depth 19.
I think Junior was wrong when it rejected 2...a6 in the main line
it does not reject 2...a6 if I give it the position after the second move of
white.

Uri




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.