Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 04:27:39 02/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2002 at 06:42:43, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >On February 09, 2002 at 05:44:36, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>Hallo Gerd, >> >>Comet's "plan" on 450 MHz hardware. It prefers Rc7, but doesn't think it's >>decisive. >> >>See you soon, >>Uli > >Hi Uli, > >Comet has a good plan here and a well tuned eval, i think. It's not decisive, >but it makes it more difficult for black to get counterplay on the queenside. Thanks. >Looking foreward to Paderborn. Me too. > >See you, >Gerd After all, Isichess is in good company here; Nimzo-99 likes f4 too: Analysis by Nimzo '99: ... 1.Kg1 Rd8 2.Qg4 Qe4 3.Qg3 Bd5 4.Bg5 ² (0.34) Depth: 9/23 00:00:12 4032kN 1.f4 ² (0.35) Depth: 9/23 00:00:15 5154kN 1.f4 Rd8 2.a5 ² (0.35) Depth: 9/23 00:00:18 6285kN 1.f4 Rd8 2.Kg1 Qd6 3.Nc6 Bxc6 4.Rxc6 Qd5 5.R1c4 b5 6.axb5 ² (0.31) Depth: 10/25 00:01:13 27965kN 1.f4 Raa8 2.Rc7 Bd8 3.Rd7 Qe4 4.Kg1 Rc8 5.Re1 b5 ² (0.30) Depth: 11/26 00:03:21 77560kN This really seems a matter of fine tuning. What do the human chess experts say ? Is it clear, that Rc7 is best here ? Uli
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.