Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 07:34:41 02/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2002 at 06:47:37, Aaron Tay wrote: >On February 08, 2002 at 07:04:32, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: > >>On February 08, 2002 at 06:33:18, Jason Williamson wrote: >> >>>you could beta test the arena gui to have something that does UCI, helping >>>yourself and them too! :) I forget to answer about the beta-testing. I just start looking at this protocol the last days so I don't think I'm the right man to betatest the UCI-support. I think this must be done by someone who also own the Shredder GUI to have a possibility to sort out if it is the GUI or the engine that is wrong. If I should present me as a betatester just to betatest my adapter I think it would be a little unfair to the Arena author. >>> >> >>I guess it is preferable to run winboard engines with the winboard protocol >>there. Whether Arena or Fritz use correct UCI support isn't important because >>where the Winboard protocol is an option all would use that. > >You are assuming that all chess engines will support Winboard primarily and then >UCI has a second option. Take the recent Monarch, it supports UCI 100% and >winboard protocol only partially. > If you go back a little you would see that I was talking about my engine and engine where the author don't have time to make the engine uci-compatible. But after a little look at the protocol now I think it's preferable to use Winboard if the engine support both too. Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.