Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The probability to find better move is simply irrelevant for diminishing

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 09:31:13 02/09/02

Go up one level in this thread


On February 09, 2002 at 10:50:29, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On February 09, 2002 at 07:44:27, Sune Fischer wrote:
>

>It is pretty straight thru 15-16 plies...  By experiment.  Which means at
>least "for a while" deeper is better.  And it _could_ be straight all the
>way to the depth where we discover the game-theoretic value.  Beyond that
>point searches can't improve things of course...

By experiment we probably can't decide either way.

Say 13-14 gives a 70 point increase, then 14-15 may only give you 69 extra
points and 15-16 gives you 68 poins.

This is diminishing returns, but 1 elo probably can't be measured by experiment.

The diviation from linearity is probably within the errorbars of the
experiments, so I think the experiments are inconclusive rather than in support
of the no DR theory.

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.