Author: Eran
Date: 15:23:58 06/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 1998 at 13:11:29, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 24, 1998 at 11:46:06, Eran wrote: > >>On June 24, 1998 at 09:51:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On June 24, 1998 at 02:00:31, Eran wrote: >>> >>>>On June 24, 1998 at 01:12:06, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>On June 24, 1998 at 00:49:24, Eran wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Rebel9 found Re1xe6 in 1 second!! >>>>> >>>>>No ill will intended toward anyone, but doesn't Rxe6 *lose*? >>>>> >>>>>bruce >>>> >>>> >>>>This is not about whether or not the move Rxe6 loses. The only thing is that I >>>>tried to show to all of you that Rebel9 with different settings in the Option >>>>menu clearly calculated faster with that specific chess position as mentioned >>>>than anti-grandmaster chess software. Ed Schroder and anybody else may not know >>>>that. So I just tried to show that to them. >>>> >>>>Now, as to the question of whehter or not the move Rxe6 loses, I cannot tell >>>>clearly. It depends on who the opponent is and what his or her playing style is. >>>> >>>>Eran >>> >>> >>>however, what's the point in finding settings in a program that suddenly >>>makes it start playing *losing* moves? That is usually *easy* to do. THe >>>hard part is to make it play *winning* moves... :) >> >>Okay, but if the move Bh6 is better than Rxe6, then I do not know why Rebel >>won't play Bh6 after one or two minutes of calculation. >> >>I think Ed Schroder believes that the move Rxe6 is a better anti-grandmaster >>move for instance in hope to make Black becoming tangled. However, it sounds to >>me that the move Rxe6 is subject to controversy; it looks like "chicken-egg >>cycle." It seems too difficult to know for sure whether or not Rxe6 is a good >>anti-grandmaster move right now. >> >>Anyway, the anti-grandmaster features in Rebel10 are just an experiment. I hope >>the anti-grandmaster chess software which Ed created would beat Vishy Anand in >>July. I think that if the anti-grandmaster features are good, Ed would retain >>them in Rebel10. Otherwise they would be thrown away. Correct me if I am wrong. >> >>Eran > > >I don't think there is any controversy here at all. Rxe6 loses. It will >lose against a computer. It will lose against a GM. It will lose against an >IM. Who cares if it wins against masters. We can already do that without >tossing material out the window... and self-attacking... So, why does Ed Schroder think anti-grandmaster moves are a little better such as the move Rxe6? Ed is one of the best chess programmers in the world, and I am still wondering why your saying is very different from what Ed thinks.... Eran
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.