Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:02:57 02/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2002 at 13:25:45, Dan Andersson wrote: >>The fact that the event that strategy C may not win is possible does not >>contradict the fact that the probability for it is exactly 0. >To prove that we have to show that the number of non won games are finite. i.e. >show that over an infinite number of games the number of N of non won games will >be less than a number L (the requirement for a probability to be exactly zero). >I would like you to provide a simple proof. > >MvH Dan Andersson I look again at this post and I do not understand what is the formal definition that you are based on. I explain the reason that it is clear to me that the probability for an infinite game is 0. The sum of the probabilities for finite games with n moves is exactly 1 and it means that the probability for an infinite game is 0. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.