Author: Chessfun
Date: 19:37:16 02/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2002 at 22:32:10, pavel wrote: >On February 09, 2002 at 22:26:17, Chessfun wrote: > >>On February 09, 2002 at 21:03:13, pavel wrote: >> >>>[D]6k1/4qp2/2b4p/4P1pP/p2Q4/1p4R1/5PP1/6K1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>> >>>55.Rd3 -0.06/13 1:56 >>> >>> >>>>1.Qc3! >>>> µ (-0.94) Depth: 13/34 00:01:12 32546kN >>>>1.Re3! >>>> µ (-0.91) Depth: 13/34 00:01:23 37257kN >>>>1.Kh2! >>>> µ (-0.87) Depth: 13/34 00:01:47 52317kN >>>>1.Kh2! >>>> µ (-0.72) Depth: 13/34 00:01:49 53550kN >>>>1.Kh2! >>>> ³ (-0.41) Depth: 13/34 00:01:59 59573kN >>>> >>>>(Sarah, Home 09.02.2002) >>> >>> >>>I guess the reason it missed the better move is because of inferior hardware >>>than yours and because the move was played in a game. >> >>I knew that already. >>My post was to indicate that Fritz knew at depth 13 opposed to >>Deep Fritz's depth 14. >> >>>Also note that the eval doesn't seem right in the game for the move, -0.06 ?? >> >>What version of Fritz played the game. The eval I posted was 006. >> >>Sarah. > >same here, I always use the latest version. > >maybe i will do further analysis later. >Right now, I am running my comp account at chess.net/ >by the way, i don'w see you often at chess.net nowadays. > >pavs I hate to admit this Pavel, but they pulled my account after it was inactive for 2 months. I never knew they had this new 2 month rule. Oh well C'est la vie. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.