Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:18:57 02/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2002 at 22:26:17, Chessfun wrote: >On February 09, 2002 at 21:03:13, pavel wrote: > >>[D]6k1/4qp2/2b4p/4P1pP/p2Q4/1p4R1/5PP1/6K1 w - - 0 1 >> >> >>55.Rd3 -0.06/13 1:56 >> >> >>>1.Qc3! >>> µ (-0.94) Depth: 13/34 00:01:12 32546kN >>>1.Re3! >>> µ (-0.91) Depth: 13/34 00:01:23 37257kN >>>1.Kh2! >>> µ (-0.87) Depth: 13/34 00:01:47 52317kN >>>1.Kh2! >>> µ (-0.72) Depth: 13/34 00:01:49 53550kN >>>1.Kh2! >>> ³ (-0.41) Depth: 13/34 00:01:59 59573kN >>> >>>(Sarah, Home 09.02.2002) >> >> >>I guess the reason it missed the better move is because of inferior hardware >>than yours and because the move was played in a game. > >I knew that already. >My post was to indicate that Fritz knew at depth 13 opposed to >Deep Fritz's depth 14. The history of the game and the hash tables may be relevant so in order to be convinced that Fritz7 can find it faster you need to do one of the following: 1)analyze with your copy of Deep Fritz the position at the same condition(without the history of the game) 2)doing the following steps: a)copy the full game(it is possible that the history of the game is relevant for the depth it finds Kh2) b)give Fritz7 48 Mbytes hash tables(it is possible that more hash tables helped Fritz7 to find Kh2 at depth 13). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.