Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 03:05:59 02/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2002 at 23:09:07, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 09, 2002 at 19:55:58, Andrew Williams wrote: > >>Hi Ed, >> >>PostModernist says: >> >>EPD TEST SET: rebelhard.epd - 360 seconds per position >> >>ID rebelhard.epd.0001 - CORRECT in 6.05 seconds. nodes: 354557 > >Could you post the analysis and a few lines beyond? > > Albert Sorry I misunderstood. After 1.Rf7: 1...d1=Q 2.Nc6 Qg4 3.Kf8 Qc8 4.Kg7 Qxc6 After 1.Rf7 d1=Q: 2.Nc6 Qg4 3.Kf8 Qc8+ 4.Kg7 Qxc6 5.Rf8+ Kb7 After 1.Rf7 d1=Q 2.Nc6 2...Qg4 3.Kf8 Qc8 4.Kg7 Qxc6 After 1.Rf7 d1=Q 2.Nc6 Qg4 3.Kf8 Qc8 4.Kg7 Qxc6 3.Kf8 Qc8 4.Kg7 Qxc6 Andrew > >>ID rebelhard.epd.0002 - WRONG. nodes: 35362560 (Nxh6) >>ID rebelhard.epd.0003 - WRONG. nodes: 53597184 (Kd2) >>ID rebelhard.epd.0004 - WRONG. nodes: 76704256 (Rf3) >>ID rebelhard.epd.0005 - CORRECT in 273.02 seconds. nodes: 45357242 >> >>RESULT: 2 Correct (5 positions @ 360 seconds). >> >>NODES per second 163993 >> >> >>This is on an Athlon 1200. >> >>Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.