Author: Eelco de Groot
Date: 04:23:53 02/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2002 at 05:34:23, Eelco de Groot wrote:
>On February 09, 2002 at 23:09:07, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On February 09, 2002 at 19:55:58, Andrew Williams wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Ed,
>>>
>>>PostModernist says:
>>>
>>>EPD TEST SET: rebelhard.epd - 360 seconds per position
>>>
>>>ID rebelhard.epd.0001 - CORRECT in 6.05 seconds. nodes: 354557
>>
>>Could you post the analysis and a few lines beyond?
>>
>> Albert
>>
>>>ID rebelhard.epd.0002 - WRONG. nodes: 35362560 (Nxh6)
>>>ID rebelhard.epd.0003 - WRONG. nodes: 53597184 (Kd2)
>>>ID rebelhard.epd.0004 - WRONG. nodes: 76704256 (Rf3)
>>>ID rebelhard.epd.0005 - CORRECT in 273.02 seconds. nodes: 45357242
>>>
>>>RESULT: 2 Correct (5 positions @ 360 seconds).
>>>
>>>NODES per second 163993
>>>
>>>
>>>This is on an Athlon 1200.
>>>
>>>Andrew
>
>
>Me too! I would like to know what Troitzky's intended line was in his study. I
>couldn't find the study on the Net, so far.
>
>Trying Q5T it won't play Rf7:
>
>[d]k2N2K1/8/8/8/5R2/3n4/3p4/8 w - - bm Rf7 (Troitzky);
>
>Game begin
>
>00:00 05.01 -3.22 1.Rf1
>00:00 07.01 -3.71 1.Rf1
>00:01 08.00 -4.01 1.Ra4+ Kb8 2.Ra1 Nc1 3.Rb1+ Kc8 4.Nf7 d1=Q
>00:01 08.01 -3.79 1.Rf1 Ne1 2.Nf7 d1=Q 3.Rg1 dxe2 4.Rg7
>00:02 09.00 -3.97 1.Rf1 Ne1 2.Ne6 d1=Q 3.Rf8+ Kb7 4.Rf7+
>00:05 10.00 -4.06 1.Rf1 Ne1 2.Ne6 d1=Q 3.Rf8+ Kb7 4.Rf7+
>00:16 11.00 -4.40 1.Rf1 Ne1 2.Nc6 d1=Q 3.Rf8+ Kb7 4.Nd8
>01:35 12.00 -4.39 1.Rf1 Ne1 2.Nc6 d1=Q 3.Rf8+ Kb7 4.Nd8+
>04:05 13.00 -4.59 1.Rf1 Ne1 2.Nc6 d1=Q 3.Rf8+ Kb7 4.Nd8+
>22:10 14.00 -4.59 1.Rf1 Ne1 2.Nf7 d1=Q 3.Rg1 Ka7 4.Rg7
>13:11 15.00 -4.76 1.Rf1 Ne1 2.Nf7 d1=Q 3.Rg1 dxb3 4.Rg7
>
>And after 1.Rf7:
>
>Rebel Engine for ECTool. (c) Ed Schröder
>
>Engine version : REBEL CENTURY 2
>Rebel personality : "Personality Q5T"
>Opening book file : RebelC.mvs
>Hash table size : 4 MB
>Analysis mode : Analyzing next move
>Refresh interval : 500 ms
>
>Last Move : 1.Rf7 (Black to play)
>
>00:00 05.00 4.54 1..d1=Q 2.Re7 Nc5 3.Ne6 dxg4+ 4.Ng7
>00:01 08.00 5.09 1..d1=Q 2.Re7 Nc5 3.Ne6 dxd5 4.Re8+ Kb7
>00:02 09.00 5.47 1..d1=Q 2.Re7 dxg4+ 3.Rg7 gxc8 4.Kh7 Nf4
>00:04 10.00 5.90 1..d1=Q 2.Ne6 dxg4+ 3.Ng7 Ne5 4.Rf5 g3
>00:06 11.00 5.91 1..d1=Q 2.Ne6 Ne5 3.Re7 dxg4+ 4.Ng7 gxg5
>01:16 12.00 6.55 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg4+ 3.Kh7 gxh4+ 4.Kg8 hxg5+
>03:43 13.00 6.15 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg1=Q+ 3.Kh7 gxh2+ 4.Kg7 hxe5+
>06:14 14.00 6.13 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg4+ 3.Kh7 gxh4+ 4.Kg7 hxg5+
>25:49 15.00 6.59 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg4+ 3.Kh7 gxh4+ 4.Kg8 hxg5+
>07:27 16.00 6.59 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg4+ 3.Kh7 gxh4+ 4.Kg8 hxg5+
>
>Iteration 17 looks to be a fail-low but that could take quite a while. Celeron
>500 MHz, clocking 8 hours so far on a reply to 1.Rf7.
Of this last analysis, this is the logfile below. It shows a FEN with White to
move which I think should be Black? Maybe something went wrong entering 1.Rf7.
Thinking....
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ -
8 | *K| | | N | | | K | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ 00:00:00 00:00:00
7 | | | | | | R | | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | | | | | | | | | Time
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ Hash 4 Mb
5 | | | | | | | | | Engine Rebel Century 2.0
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ Personality Y5b.eng
4 | | | | | | | | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | | | | *N| | | | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | | | | *p| | | | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | | | | | | | | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ 1.. Rf4-f7
a b c d e f g h
k2N2K1/5R2/8/8/8/3n4/3p4/8 w - -
[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date "-9928.-54.-20"]
[Round ""]
[White ""]
[Black ""]
[Result "*"]
[BlackElo ""]
[WhiteElo ""]
[FEN "k2N2K1/5R2/8/8/8/3n4/3p4/8 w - - 0 1"]
1.Rf7 *
00:00 01.00 3.99 1..d1=Q
00:00 02.00 3.60 1..d1=Q 2.Rd7
00:00 03.00 4.21 1..d1=Q 2.Rh7 dxf3
00:00 04.00 4.17 1..d1=Q 2.Rg7 dxh5 3.Kf8
00:00 05.00 4.54 1..d1=Q 2.Re7 Nc5 3.Ne6 dxg4+ 4.Ng7
00:00 06.00 4.73 1..d1=Q 2.Rg7 Nc5 3.Nf7 Ne6 4.Rg2
00:01 07.00 5.03 1..d1=Q 2.Re7 Nc5 3.Ne6 dxd5 4.Re8+
Kb7 (0)
00:01 08.00 5.09 1..d1=Q 2.Re7 Nc5 3.Ne6 dxd5 4.Re8+
Kb7 (1)
00:02 09.00 5.47 1..d1=Q 2.Re7 dxg4+ 3.Rg7 gxc8 4.Kh7
Nf4 (1)
00:04 10.00 5.90 1..d1=Q 2.Ne6 dxg4+ 3.Ng7 Ne5 4.Rf5
g3 (2)
00:06 11.00 5.91 1..d1=Q 2.Ne6 Ne5 3.Re7 dxg4+ 4.Ng7
gxg5 (4)
01:16 12.00 6.55 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg4+ 3.Kh7 gxh4+
4.Kg8 hxg5+ (14)
03:43 13.00 6.15 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg1=Q+ 3.Kh7 gxh2+
4.Kg7 hxe5+ (91)
06:14 14.00 6.13 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg4+ 3.Kh7 gxh4+
4.Kg7 hxg5+ (230)
25:49 15.00 6.59 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg4+ 3.Kh7 gxh4+
4.Kg8 hxg5+ (943)
07:27 16.00 6.59 1..d1=Q 2.Rf8 dxg4+ 3.Kh7 gxh4+
4.Kg8 hxg5+ (5191)
Positions : 291.773.916
Nodes per second : 8.317
Extensions (checks) : 129.728.673 (0%)
Extensions (captures) : 28.229.018 (-5%)
Extensions (king safety) : 727.558 (0%)
Extensions (on depth) : 0 (0%)
Extensions (remaining) : 37.104 (0%)
Extensions (total) : 158.722.352 (54%)
Hash Table : 74.231.648 74.231.648 (99%)
Average depth : 2
Deepest depth : 48
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.