Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 11:52:09 02/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2002 at 05:24:29, Kevin Heider wrote: >>>I can't judge if 1..hxg5 is losing. The overnight analysis... >>> >>>00:00:05.6 0,86 10 3055274 hxg5 hxg5 Nh7 Rh1 e5 g4 exd4 Qh2 >>>00:00:11.1 0,69 11 6726882 hxg5 hxg5 Ne8 Rh1 g6 f5 e5 Nxc6 >>>00:00:27.2 0,58 12 16883904 hxg5 hxg5 Nh7 Rh1 g6 Nxc6 bxc6 Qd3 >>>00:01:29.8 0,39 13 60832208 hxg5 hxg5 Nd7 Rh1 Bf8 g4 g6 Ndb5 >>>00:05:06.7 0,20 14 212189694 hxg5 hxg5 Nd7 Rh1 g6 Ncb5 Bxb5 Nxb5 >>>00:17:32.1 0,00 15 753494654 hxg5 hxg5 Nh7 g4 e5 Nxc6 bxc6 Qh2 >>>00:42:21.5 0,15 15 1810582974 a6 Bxf6 Bxf6 Qf2 b5 a3 Rab8 >>>02:23:38.2 0,06 16 1847578472 a6 f5 hxg5 hxg5 Nh7 g6 Ng5 gxf7+ >>>03:34:05.6 0,08 16 583648265 Rac8 Bxf6 Bxf6 h5 Bxd4 > >>It seems Rebel feels it can get away with hxg5 but finally looks at other >>options instead of taking the B. > >Actually, looking at Rebel's output it looks like PxB is probably bad. Every >ply deeper Rebel looked at PxB the evaluation dropped ~0.2 pawns. > >Notice at ply 15, Rebel scores the position =. >-- Kevin Heider Yes I did notice that...but it felt it was a draw....maybe at 24plys or so it would see it was losing? Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.