Author: K. Burcham
Date: 17:11:25 02/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2002 at 19:50:25, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 10, 2002 at 17:31:10, Aseldar Salautdinov wrote: > >>[D]8/R7/6kp/1Pp5/2P2K2/7P/p4P2/8 b - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Fritz 7 (22.01.2002): >> > >> +- (#230) Depth: 11/24 00:00:01 765kN >>63...h5! >> +- (#235) Depth: 11/24 00:00:01 777kN >>63...h5! >> +- (#245) Depth: 11/24 00:00:02 788kN >>63...h5! >> +- (#265) Depth: 11/24 00:00:02 799kN >>63...h5! >> +- (#265) Depth: 11/24 00:00:02 823kN > >I guess the question is: who can do better? > > Albert hello Albert. not sure what you mean. but your program must be drug free to find this mate in 7. my fritz7 is not drug free, you can see by my other post with fritz7. here is shredder5, drug free. [D] 8/R7/6kp/1Pp5/2P2K2/7P/p4P2/8 b - - Shredder 5: 1000mhz 12.01 0:01 -M7 1...Kh5 2.b6 Kh4 3.b7 Kxh3 4.b8Q Kg2 5.Rxa2 h5 6.f3+ Kh3 7.Qc8+ Kh4 8.Rh2+ (567.727) 288.4 13.01 0:02 -M7 1...Kh5 2.b6 Kh4 3.b7 Kxh3 4.b8Q Kg2 5.Rxa2 h5 6.f3+ Kh3 7.Qc8+ Kh4 8.Rh2+ (770.550) 257.0 14.01 0:03 -M7 1...Kh5 2.b6 Kh4 3.b7 Kxh3 4.b8Q Kg2 5.Rxa2 h5 6.f3+ Kh3 7.Qc8+ Kh4 8.Rh2+ (1.046.322) 277.3 15.01 0:12 -M7 1...Kh5 2.b6 Kh4 3.b7 Kxh3 4.b8Q Kg2 5.Rxa2 h5 6.f3+ Kh3 7.Qc8+ Kh4 8.Rh2+ (3.478.157) 273.4 16.01 0:21 -M7 1...Kh5 2.b6 Kh4 3.b7 Kxh3 4.b8Q Kg2 5.Rxa2 h5 6.f3+ Kh3 7.Qc8+ Kh4 8.Rh2+ (6.269.429) 298.0 17.01 0:52 -M7 1...Kh5 2.b6 Kh4 3.b7 Kxh3 4.b8Q Kg2 5.Rxa2 h5 6.f3+ Kh3 7.Qc8+ Kh4 8.Rh2+ (16.375.154) 309.4 18.01 1:49 -M7 1...Kh5 2.b6 Kh4 3.b7 Kxh3 4.b8Q Kg2 5.Rxa2 h5 6.f3+ Kh3 7.Qc8+ Kh4 8.Rh2+ (35.811.006) 327.9 best move: Kg6-h5 time: 2:00.204 min n/s: 330.048 nodes: 39.671.185 TB: 34.950 kburcham
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.