Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 08:31:35 02/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2002 at 11:24:28, K. Burcham wrote: > > >Please write out the number for these nodes that i took from program analysis. >This was taken from three pc's analyzing same position. >These numbers dont seem correct to me. The large number fritz7 posts, using >smaller mhz and only 5 hours. do all programs post in kn's? Is shredder6 kn? >fritz7 posts in kn's, so i assume i can write this 13,204,724,000. >Do you just add three 0's to chess tiger for each period, and then three more >because it is actually a kn value? if true then that value would be >7,089,194,000,000? this number now is 13 didgits, DS is only 11 didgits. >I know i am making this more complicated then it is. >I just worked out the math and it seems S6 does not post in kn. >kburcham > >3100 mhz >Deep Shredder6 Depth 18 9 hours 15,884,648,840 nodes > >1507mhz >Chess Tiger 14.0 Depth 19 10 hours 7089194... > >1000mhz >Fritz7 Depth 16 5 hours 13204724kn It does not make any sense to compare node counts between two different programs. Some programs visit a lot of nodes and others far less so. At very deep levels of analysis, it is not uncommon for bad numbers to be reported anyway.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.