Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 09:10:33 02/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2002 at 12:14:22, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On February 09, 2002 at 03:07:47, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On February 08, 2002 at 17:17:26, Oliver Roese wrote: >> >>>Hi! >>> >>>http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/338945.html >>>Hope you find it interesting. >> >>Unless I've screwed it up a bit, it doesn't quite work right at the endpoints. > >If you take the trouble of understanding the *idea* of the algorithm, you would >realize that the idea is sound even if a particular incarnation in code may not >be. A perfect hash that maps to the right bit is obviously a commically simple idea. However, if the author of the original paper has not bother to make even the most rudimentary tests for correctness, I doubt the entire outcome of the paper. Is it really faster? Maybe not, if you have to model everthing correctly.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.