Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:23:08 02/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2002 at 12:53:32, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On February 08, 2002 at 17:17:26, Oliver Roese wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/338945.html >>Hope you find it interesting. >> >>Oliver > >Yes, it is quite interesting. Thanks! > >For 32 bits, the perfect hash function x%37 instead of the minimal perfect hash >function (x*debruijn32)>>27 also works well. The difference is a slightly larger >lookup table will be needed and a division is performed instead of a >multiplication plus a shift. For 64 bits the modulus 67 works. Have you made a 64 bit version? I would be interested to know your benchmark results.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.