Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 13:30:29 02/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2002 at 16:09:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 12, 2002 at 14:44:41, pavel wrote: > >>Thanks for the test, it was very ineteresting. >>I am running one myself with these engines at 40'/40+ 40'/40+ 40' >> >> >>1 Junior 7 >>2 Hiarcs 7.32 >>3 Nimzo 8 >>4 Shredder 6 >>5 Crafty 17.14 >>6 Chess Tiger 14.0 >>7 Crafty 18.13 >>8 Fritz 7 >> >> >>Average elo: 2462 <=> Category: 9 >>gm = 98.00 m = 70.00 >> >>so much for my intuitions.... >>;) > >If you are referring to the fact that 18.13 got a 1% higher score than 17.14: >6 Crafty 18.13 : 2544 92 82 50 34.0 % 2659 28.0 % >7 Crafty 17.14 : 2536 85 81 50 33.0 % 2659 34.0 % > >Also consider that this also is not proof of superiority of 18.13 over 17.14. >The error margin leaves this [cough] "clearly inconclusive" I did point this out in my post.... >So your intutition may yet be correct after all (as far as which is stronger). >But to imagine that 17.14 will always be on top is probably unrealistic, since >the strength is obviously very close. I have seen other results that show 18.13 >superior and also other results that show 17.14 is superior. I think we do know >this: >18.13 and 17.14 are two of the better crafty versions and both are very strong. Yes the 1% difference makes that pretty obvious. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.