Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 06:00:15 02/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
It seems there isn't a whole lot of difference with Deep Junior 6 as you said. Here are the results... 32mb hash 1850MHz, 1.3gb/sec ram DJMark 994 | 1422Kn/s 128mb hash 1850MHz, 1.3gb/sec ram DJMark 943 | 1355Kn/s 32mb hash 1850MHz, 2.2gb/sec ram DJMark 1003 | 1446Kn/s 128mb hash 1850MHz, 2.2gb/sec ram DJMark 977 | 1404Kn On February 13, 2002 at 07:08:38, Marc van Hal wrote: >On February 13, 2002 at 03:26:42, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On February 13, 2002 at 03:24:25, Aaron Gordon wrote: >> >>>Looks to me as if it's just chessbase's 'speed rating' based off NPS values. Why >>>it doesn't only show the NPS I don't know, perhaps it's easier for some people >>>to compare via the Fritzmark. I prefer using the NPS values of course. There are >>>people here though interested in the 'Fritzmark' number so I figured I'd include >>>that as well as it only takes less than a second to type it. :P If you ever ask >>>Chessbase about it let me know what their response is. >> >>NPS gets killed by big hash tables. You don't have to calculate the node, >>because it is already done in the hash table. >> >>I would like to see analysis of some tough position for 60 seconds instead, to >>get some idea of what is really going on. I suspect that the difference will be >>a lot more dramatic with big tables and fast ram than the fritzmark shows. > >Like I told before Fritz is very attached too ram . (at least Fritz5.32 and >Fritz6) >Try the same test with any version of Junior >And the diference will not be to big. >cause Junior is more attached to raw CPU speed. > >Regards Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.