Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Chessbase UCI protocol

Author: Miguel A. Ballicora

Date: 09:59:30 02/13/02

Go up one level in this thread

On February 13, 2002 at 11:58:39, Jason Williamson wrote:

>Aside from the the Fritz 7 gui not showing the string based options of the
>engines, it seems to perform better.  Bringer 1.9 won a tournament on my maching
>for the first time ever when I used Malin's WB2UCI adapter.  AFAIK it doesn't
>send any stupid new commands every move now.  :)

In a different way, the UCI protocol does it. The good thing is that
it is very well speficied but UCI still forces the engine to start from a
"new position" each move. In spirit, there is no difference, but the programmer
can be better prepared because it is better documented. Despite it is
documented, I still do not like it (from the programmer's point of view).

Regards,
Miguel

>JW

• Re: Chessbase UCI protocol Steve Maughan 11:09:12 02/13/02
  • Re: Chessbase UCI protocol Miguel A. Ballicora 16:57:50 02/14/02
    • Re: Chessbase UCI protocol Steve Maughan 20:14:00 02/14/02
      • Re: Chessbase UCI protocol Odd Gunnar Malin 00:56:55 02/15/02
      • Re: Chessbase UCI protocol Miguel A. Ballicora 22:05:22 02/14/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.