Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Question for chess programmers: Go

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 15:01:51 02/13/02

Go up one level in this thread

On February 13, 2002 at 17:42:08, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On February 13, 2002 at 17:35:57, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>Even if I suppose that we know to evaluate only checkmate in chess more time can
>>help because knowing the final result of the game one ply earlier can help in
>>part of the cases to find the right move.
>
>Go has no checkmate. The game is over when both players agree it is over.

I do not understand.
if both sides need to agree that one of them won the game then I can avoid
losing in go.
I simply will never agree that the game is over.

There must be a position in the board that means by definition that the game is
over.
Otherwise the game has no meaning.

Uri

• Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Pekka Karjalainen 22:39:43 02/13/02
  • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Jason Williamson 14:28:14 02/14/02
    • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Pekka Karjalainen 05:32:02 02/15/02
    • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Gian-Carlo Pascutto 15:07:12 02/14/02
      • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Jason Williamson 16:33:43 02/14/02
        • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Uri Blass 16:58:51 02/14/02
          • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Jason Williamson 18:30:13 02/14/02
            • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Uri Blass 22:33:33 02/14/02
              • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Gian-Carlo Pascutto 01:26:10 02/15/02
                • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Pekka Karjalainen 05:44:07 02/15/02
• Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Gian-Carlo Pascutto 15:03:38 02/13/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.