Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 00:39:09 02/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2002 at 22:22:42, pavel wrote: >On February 13, 2002 at 20:39:35, Robin Smith wrote: > >>On February 13, 2002 at 16:45:27, pavel wrote: >> >>>Shredder 6 - Chess Tiger 14.0 >>>3r1k2/1p3p2/1p4pp/5P2/1PB5/P7/2Rb1P1P/6K1 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Chess Tiger 14.0: >>> >>>33...g6xf5 34.Kg1-g2 Kf8-e7 35.Kg2-f3 Rd8-d4 36.Bc4-b5 Bd2-f4 37.Rc2-c4 Rd4xc4 >>>38.Bb5xc4 Bf4xh2 >>> ³ (-0.64) Depth: 10 00:00:00 149kN >>>33...g6xf5 34.Kg1-g2 Bd2-f4 35.h2-h3 Kf8-e7 36.Kg2-f3 Bf4-e5 37.Kf3-e3 Rd8-a8 >>>38.Rc2-a2 >>> ³ (-0.62) Depth: 10 00:00:00 219kN >>>33...g6xf5 34.Kg1-g2 Bd2-f4 35.h2-h3 Kf8-e7 36.Kg2-f3 Bf4-e5 37.a3-a4 Ke7-f6 >>>38.b4-b5 Rd8-d1 >>> µ (-0.76) Depth: 11 00:00:01 652kN >>>33...g6xf5 34.Bc4-e2 Bd2-f4 35.Be2-f3 Rd8-d7 36.Rc2-c8+ Kf8-e7 37.Kg1-g2 Ke7-e6 >>>38.Rc8-a8 Bf4-c1 39.Ra8-a7 f7-f6 40.Ra7xb7 Rd7xb7 41.Bf3xb7 Bc1xa3 >>> µ (-0.72) Depth: 12 00:00:04 1411kN >>>33...g6xf5 34.Bc4-e2 Bd2-f4 35.Be2-f3 Rd8-d7 36.Rc2-c8+ Kf8-e7 37.Kg1-g2 Ke7-e6 >>>38.Rc8-a8 Bf4-c1 39.Ra8-a7 Bc1-b2 40.Ra7xb7 Rd7xb7 41.Bf3xb7 Bb2xa3 >>> µ (-0.71) Depth: 13 00:00:07 2556kN >>>33...g6xf5 34.Bc4-e2 Bd2-f4 35.Be2-f3 Rd8-d7 36.Rc2-c8+ Kf8-g7 37.Kg1-g2 Bf4-e5 >>>38.h2-h4 Be5-b2 39.Rc8-a8 Kg7-f6 40.Ra8-a7 Kf6-e5 41.Ra7xb7 Rd7xb7 42.Bf3xb7 >>>Bb2xa3 >>> ³ (-0.70) Depth: 14 00:00:11 3944kN >>>33...g6xf5 34.Bc4-b5 Bd2-f4 35.Rc2-c3 Kf8-e7 36.Rc3-d3 Rd8-g8+ 37.Kg1-f1 Bf4-d6 >>>38.Rd3-h3 Rg8-h8 39.Kf1-e2 Ke7-f6 40.Ke2-d3 Bd6-e5 >>> ³ (-0.68) Depth: 15 00:00:24 8314kN >>>33...g6xf5 34.Bc4-e2 Bd2-f4 35.Be2-f3 Rd8-d7 36.Rc2-c8+ Kf8-g7 37.Kg1-g2 Bf4-e5 >>>38.h2-h3 Kg7-f6 39.Rc8-h8 Be5-f4 40.Rh8-c8 Kf6-e5 41.Rc8-b8 Bf4-c1 42.Rb8xb7 >>>Rd7xb7 >>> ³ (-0.70) Depth: 16 00:01:21 25773kN >>>33...g6xf5 34.Bc4-e2 Bd2-f4 35.Be2-f3 Rd8-d7 36.Rc2-c8+ Kf8-g7 37.Kg1-g2 Bf4-e5 >>>38.h2-h3 Kg7-f6 39.Rc8-h8 Be5-f4 40.Rh8-c8 Kf6-e5 41.Rc8-b8 Bf4-c1 42.Rb8xb7 >>>Rd7xb7 43.Bf3xb7 >>> ³ (-0.70) Depth: 16 00:01:21 25773kN >>> >>>(Mahamood, MyTown 13.02.2002) >>> >>> >>>Shredder doesn't agree (till now) >>> >>>gotta go to class, bye. >> >>Symetric pawns. Opposite bishops. It is hard to see this ending in anything >>but a draw. What makes this position interesting? >> >>Robin > >I don't remember typing the word "interesting". >It was another example of chess tiger evaluating an even position wrong. >Shredder thought it was even, immidiately. >The game was drawn. Missed the eval by less than a pawn in an early endgame. I think I could forgive it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.