Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Question for chess programmers: Go

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 15:10:53 02/14/02

Go up one level in this thread

On February 13, 2002 at 17:13:25, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On February 13, 2002 at 13:58:41, Uri Blass wrote:

>>1)What is the rating difference from having hardware that is twice faster in >go?

>Approximately 0.



A Go program that can run on an original IBM PC at 4.77 MHz would necessarily be
at least a little stronger if it ran on an Athlon 2000+, no?  The only way I can
see that not being the case is if there is no time limit per move (or per game
or per set of moves) that is of any constraint to any decent algorithm.  [Even
doing only a static position evaluation should take some non-trivial number of
CPU cycles to achieve a given level of strength.]

• Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Gian-Carlo Pascutto 15:23:56 02/14/02
  • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Uri Blass 16:13:28 02/14/02
    • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Pekka Karjalainen 05:52:55 02/15/02
    • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Georg v. Zimmermann 04:27:41 02/15/02
    • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Gian-Carlo Pascutto 01:18:48 02/15/02
      • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Uri Blass 04:27:08 02/15/02
        • Re: Question for chess programmers: Go Pekka Karjalainen 05:57:11 02/15/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.