Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 04:27:41 02/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
Very good reasoning , I agree. Georg > >In every finite game when the rules are clear better hardware or more time can >help > >If I have a program A that almost does not use time then it is easy to develop a >program B that is going to win against A. > >B will try every legal move and continue by playing A against itself. >B is going to choose the move that leaded to the best result against A. > >It is clear that B is going to beat A in a match and I cannot believe that B is >not going to be at least slightly better than A against other programs. > >I can believe that software is very important in go and I can believe that the >best program can beat the second best program even when the hardware of the >second best program is 100 times faster but I cannot believe that better >hardware cannot help without a design of the programmer not to use time >intentionally. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.