Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 11:13:18 02/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2002 at 08:36:06, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 13, 2002 at 21:19:11, Tina Long wrote: > >>On February 13, 2002 at 11:00:56, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>Suspect? Motive? Crime? Cool! I hope I'm at least being profiled for something >>>absolutely dastardly. >>> >> >>I have it on very good authority that Albert has used opening moves in his chess >>games (including 3...Bg7) that were originally analysed & posted here by Marc. >>Albert does Not append his scoresheet with "Opening accredited to M van Hal". >> >>No wonder Marc has it in for him. >> >>Tina Long >>(Just stirring the Pot) > >Trust me Tina, the LAST thing he wants is to be accredited with the things I >play in the opening. > > Albert Well Tina is a litle bit on the right track (Though also she is kind of trolling. She asks questions where she already knows the anwers to. And if you tell this she will deny it. In fact this does not look to smart to me but ok. But it shows again the fact that many times wars started because of women (The most famous was Cleopatra.) Who later on complain that men always want to make war. ) So are you I don't want a credit from your openingsmoves from move 3 Not even from Kasparov! Only if so called noveltys are played which come from my hand. OK now to The facts and mixing of things in the past you where one of the people who always kept on saying that I had too proof that postings I made where realy mine. Further about this mather At the moment some one brings out a product with my anelyses they get deleted from the CCC archives. (For the good folowers of my anelyses How many postings did I make over the Pirc? And how many can you find now Or the Kh1 variation of the queens gambit With Bf4! The move Qc7! instead of Qa5 in the Grunfeld defence played in the WC Match Kramnik-Kasparov The excange variation of the queens gambit. With a realy wild end. The Berlin defense The game van Welly FritzSSS Nk 2000 Actualy all my finest work,to much to mention.) Being already punished for my good trust in humanety by the ICC webmaster? Or hackers. Coments from other people pointing at this realy eats out your heart. This is why I called you a troll. A good hearted human would not act in this way. But I actualy started all this because of the mailbomb posting And the answers to it. Which where extremely agresive And I always want peel such apels. Later on mailbomb ,hacking I could conclude if you where on the page where you downloaded the mailbomb a hackers utilety and some documents on how to use them where not hard to find. Though you should be prety lucky if it worked at once the first time. At least this is how a policeoficer thinks. Friendly Greetings Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.