Author: Slater Wold
Date: 19:40:11 02/15/02
Just played a "warm up" game between RC 4 and Crafty. It was really a unique
game. I don't think I have _ever_ seen two totally different engines. (Playing
styles, etc.)
Crafty 18.13 (AMD 2x1.6Ghz) - Rebel Century 4 (AMD 1.2Ghz)
1.f4 d5 2.Nf3 g6 3.e3 Bg7 4.d4 Nf6 5.Bd3 0-0 6.0-0 c5 7.c3 Nbd7 8.f5 e6 9.fxe6
fxe6 10.c4 b6 11.Ng5 Qe7 12.Nc3 Bb7 13.Qe2 Rac8 14.Bd2 Bh6 15.h4 Bxg5 16.hxg5
Ne4 17.Bxe4 dxe4 18.a4 Rf5 19.a5 bxa5 20.Rxa5 cxd4 21.Raxf5 exf5 22.exd4 Nf8
23.Be3 Qb4 24.c5 Ne6 25.Qf2 Rd8 26.Rd1 Qb3 27.Ra1 f4 28.Bxf4 Rf8 29.Ra3 Qc4
30.g3 Nxg5 31.Qe2 Qxd4+ 32.Be3 Qe5 33.Bxg5 Qxg3+ 34.Qg2 0-1
Here's an interesting eval:
Move 33
time used: 1:44
time surplus 0.00 time limit 1:24 (5:38)
nss depth time score variation (1)
9-> 0.08 -0.58 10. Kg2 Rf3 11. Qc4+ Qe6 12. Qxe6+
Nxe6 13. Rxa7 Rxe3 14. Rxb7 Nxc5 15.
Re7 <HT>
10 0.08 -0.58 10. Kg2 Rf3 11. Qc4+ Qe6 12. Qxe6+
Nxe6 13. Rxa7 Rxe3 14. Rxb7 Nxc5 15.
Re7 <HT>
10-> 0.20 -0.58 10. Kg2 Rf3 11. Qc4+ Qe6 12. Qxe6+
Nxe6 13. Rxa7 Rxe3 14. Rxb7 Nxc5 15.
Re7 <HT>
11 0.20 -0.58 10. Kg2 Rf3 11. Qc4+ Qe6 12. Qxe6+
Nxe6 13. Rxa7 Rxe3 14. Rxb7 Nxc5 15.
Re7 <HT>
11-> 0.47 -0.58 10. Kg2 Rf3 11. Qc4+ Qe6 12. Qxe6+
Nxe6 13. Rxa7 Rxe3 14. Rxb7 Nxc5 15.
Re7 <HT>
12 49.99 -- 10. Kg2
12 1:13 -7.03 10. Kg2 Qe6 11. Bxg5 e3+ 12. Kg1 Qh3
13. c6 Bxc6 14. Qc4+ Rf7 15. Qxf7+
Kxf7 16. Rxa7+ Kg8 17. Ne4 Bxe4 18.
Bxe3 Qxg3+
12 1:48 -6.60 10. Qg4 Nf3+ 11. Kg2 Bc8 12. Qf4 Rxf4
13. gxf4 Nh4+ 14. Kf2 Qh5 15. Nd5 Qxd5
16. Rxa7 Bg4
12 3:39 -3.55 10. Bxg5 Qxg3+ 11. Qg2 Qe1+ 12. Kh2
Rf2 13. Rxa7 Rxg2+ 14. Kxg2 e3+ 15.
Rxb7 Qf2+ 16. Kh1 Qf3+ 17. Kg1 Qxb7
18. Bxe3 Qxb2
time=5:39 cpu=199% mat=-1 n=531764286 fh=91% nps=1566k
ext-> chk=38207556 cap=1059160 pp=1559140 1rep=3964636 mate=171355
predicted=0 nodes=531764286 evals=109172304
endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0
hashing-> trans/ref=18% pawn=99% used=99%
SMP-> split=1205 stop=303 data=9/32 cpu=11:18 elap=5:39
30. g3 was the kicker. (Because Crafty was unable to see 30..Nxg5!) Here is
Crafty's eval before making that move:
time used: 1:39
time surplus 0.00 time limit 1:27 (6:55)
nss depth time score variation (1)
9 0.14 -0.04 7. Ra4 Qd3 8. g3 Nxg5 9. Kh2 Nf3+ 10.
Kg2 Bc6 11. Rxa7 Nxd4
9 0.14 0.00 7. g3 Nxd4 8. Ra4 Nf3+ 9. Kg2 Nh4+
10. Kh2 Nf3+ <HT>
9-> 0.15 0.00 7. g3 Nxd4 8. Ra4 Nf3+ 9. Kg2 Nh4+
10. Kh2 Nf3+ <HT>
10 0.15 0.00 7. g3 Nxd4 8. Ra4 Nf3+ 9. Kg2 Nh4+
10. Kh2 Nf3+ <HT>
10-> 0.26 0.00 7. g3 Nxd4 8. Ra4 Nf3+ 9. Kg2 Nh4+
10. Kh2 Nf3+ <HT>
11 0.26 0.00 7. g3 Nxd4 8. Ra4 Nf3+ 9. Kg2 Nh4+
10. Kh2 Nf3+ <HT>
11-> 0.40 0.00 7. g3 Nxd4 8. Ra4 Nf3+ 9. Kg2 Nh4+
10. Kh2 Nf3+ <HT>
12 0.40 0.00 7. g3 Nxd4 8. Ra4 Nf3+ 9. Kg2 Nh4+
10. Kh2 Nf3+ <HT>
12-> 1.01 0.00 7. g3 Nxd4 8. Ra4 Nf3+ 9. Kg2 Nh4+
10. Kh2 Nf3+ <HT>
time=1:27 cpu=199% mat=1 n=133149560 fh=90% nps=1515k
ext-> chk=5381716 cap=296255 pp=238761 1rep=444604 mate=19915
predicted=0 nodes=133149560 evals=30549808
endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0
hashing-> trans/ref=21% pawn=99% used=99%
SMP-> split=222 stop=24 data=7/32 cpu=2:55 elap=1:27
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.