Author: pavel
Date: 04:50:52 02/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2002 at 02:21:51, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On February 16, 2002 at 18:33:15, Sune Larsson wrote: > >>>>>.... I believe there is some problem with the setting of the >>>>>tournament. > >I can assure you that there is no problem with the setting of the tournament. > >We knew that TheKing312X is very strong. In our tests, mainly 40'/40, >ponder=off, the program has played 339 games against all top programs with the >result of 186-153 or 55 %. And what must be said too is that Johan de Koning's >program seems to become even stronger at longer time controls. But our >tournament T2002 is not yet over and if you look at the following list (basis = >2400 ELO) > ><pre> > Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - >Draws > > 1 TheKing312X : 42.0/ 68 61.8 2386 2469 73 61 >41.2 % > 2 Fritz7002 : 38.0/ 68 55.9 2392 2433 79 53 >47.1 % > 3 Junior7 : 34.5/ 68 50.7 2399 2404 86 57 >39.7 % > 4 ChessTiger14 : 31.0/ 68 45.6 2406 2375 57 81 >41.2 % > 5 Hiarcs732 : 30.5/ 68 44.9 2406 2370 63 80 >33.8 % > 6 Shredder6 : 28.0/ 68 41.2 2411 2349 60 76 >41.2 %</pre> > >the performance of TheKing321X lies between the margin of error. And eventually, >TheKing is so far the only program that has not yet suffered from producing some >losses in a row. We think that this will sometime happen. > >Kurt As I said "I might be very wrong" and also "no offense to you" ;) anyways, I am eagerly waiting for the release of the setting pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.