Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Easy for humans

Author: Peter McKenzie

Date: 10:27:28 02/17/02

Go up one level in this thread


On February 17, 2002 at 13:10:50, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On February 17, 2002 at 12:03:18, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On February 17, 2002 at 11:43:09, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On February 17, 2002 at 11:34:40, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 17, 2002 at 05:43:22, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On February 17, 2002 at 05:21:47, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On February 17, 2002 at 04:55:13, Steffen Jakob wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Here is another position which is easy to solve for humans. In a blitz game
>>>>>>>between Hossa and Arasan the following position was on the board:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[D]8/8/4B2p/2K5/r5P1/p5k1/Rb6/8 b - - 7 116
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>For humans it's rather easy to see that 117... Rxg4 wins without any problems
>>>>>>>because the white rook is totally paralyzed. Unfortunately Hossa wasn't able to
>>>>>>>see this in the blitz game. So the game continued until the 50 moves rule forced
>>>>>>>Hossa to take the bishop and finally to win the game.
>>>>>>>Which engines find 117... Rxg4 in which time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Easy for comps too :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>2 secs for RC4
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ed
>>>>>>
>>>>>>==============================================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>>00:00:02.1	1,88	9	449751	Re4 Kd6 Re3 Bf5 Kf4 Be6 Re5 Bd7
>>>>>>00:00:02.1	1,88	9	817955	Rxg4
>>>>>>00:00:02.1	2,09	9	835992	Rxg4 Bxg4 Kxg4 Kd5 h5 Kd6 h4 Kd5
>>>>>>00:00:03.3	2,17	10	1122788	Rxg4 Bxg4 Kxg4 Kd5 h5 Ke4 h4 Ke3
>>>>>>00:00:04.5	2,01	11	2027319	Rxg4 Bxg4 Kxg4 Kc4 h5 Kd3 Kf3 Kc4
>>>>>>00:00:34.6	3,62	12	31107270	Rxg4 Bd7 h5 Bc6 Rf4 Kb5 h4 Ka5
>>>>>>00:00:44.1	3,82	13	41624594	Rxg4 Bd7 h5 Bc6 Rf4 Bb5
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Trivial for Deep Fritz
>>>>>
>>>>>It knows that opposite color bishops with one pawn advantage gives good chances
>>>>>for a draw so it's only choice is to sacrifice the rook by evaluation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Where do you see an opposite bishops ending after Rxg4 Bxg4 Kxg4 ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Christophe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Oops... Sorry.
>>>
>>>OK, I've got it now. It's opposite colored bishops BEFORE the above capture
>>>sequence.
>>>
>>>I did not get it at first because Tiger does not consider opposite bishop
>>>endings as drawish when there are other pieces on the board (like rooks).
>>>
>>>Looks like I really should have a second look at this rule... :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Christophe
>>
>>with rooks on the board there are better chances for a win for the stronger side
>>but I believe that the chances for a draw are still better than the chances for
>
>I guess you mean "win" here ----------^^^^  ?
>
>
>>a draw in case that there are no opposite bishops.
>
>
>Do you think the above still applies if you replace the rooks by queens?

I would say no.  The theory is that you have more chances against the King when
there are bishops of opposite colours, so with queens on this is probably a
factor.

Hmm, maybe this could be a term for general king safety?  Bump up the king
safety score slightly if there are bishops of opposite colours?!

>
>
>
>    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.