Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 19:37:48 02/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
Gambit Tiger 2.0 aggressive on my old PII 333 Mhz with 96 MB RAM 00:00:00.7 1.00 7 26735 Qg3 Ne7 Qf4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 Rf3 00:00:00.7 0.84 7 39147 Qg3 Ne7 Qf4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 Rf3 Nc5 00:00:01.8 0.46 8 102128 Qg3 Ne7 Qf4 Nf5 Bb4 Qc7 Re1 f6 00:00:06.6 1.22 9 440200 Qg3 Nf8 Qf4 Nd8 Bb4 Qc7 Rc3 Nc6 Bd6 00:00:09.8 1.22 10 703452 Qg3 Nf8 Qf4 Nd8 Bb4 Qc7 Rc3 Nc6 Bd6 Qd7 00:00:18.9 2.12 10 1459555 Nxf7 00:00:48.1 5.98 10 4205748 Nxf7 Kxf7 Bxg6+ Kxg6 Qg3+ Kh7 Qg5 Qd2 Qxd2 Nb6 Qf4 Bd7 Qf7+ Kh8 Qxh5+ Kg7 Yes, bigger programs can be slower. This search would be about 3 to 4 seconds on my faster AMD 1400 with 512 MB RAM. Tim On February 17, 2002 at 21:35:42, Bob Basham wrote: >White won in this position by playing 1. Nxf7 (KxN), >then 2. Bxg6+..! > >My old version of Fritz 5.32 finds this even before the new version of Fritz 7.. > >Could it be that when they make improvements on something in a chess program >that it weakens another area? >Just wondering... > >[D]r1b1r1k1/1p1n1p2/p1nBp1p1/q2pP1Np/P7/R2B3Q/2P2PPP/5RK1 w - - > >Some computor programs do not find Nxf7 at all...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.