Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 19:48:10 02/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2002 at 22:37:48, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote:
>Gambit Tiger 2.0 aggressive on my old PII 333 Mhz with 96 MB RAM
>
>00:00:00.7 1.00 7 26735 Qg3 Ne7 Qf4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 Rf3
>00:00:00.7 0.84 7 39147 Qg3 Ne7 Qf4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 Rf3 Nc5
>00:00:01.8 0.46 8 102128 Qg3 Ne7 Qf4 Nf5 Bb4 Qc7 Re1 f6
>00:00:06.6 1.22 9 440200 Qg3 Nf8 Qf4 Nd8 Bb4 Qc7 Rc3 Nc6 Bd6
>00:00:09.8 1.22 10 703452 Qg3 Nf8 Qf4 Nd8 Bb4 Qc7 Rc3 Nc6 Bd6 Qd7
>00:00:18.9 2.12 10 1459555 Nxf7
>00:00:48.1 5.98 10 4205748 Nxf7 Kxf7 Bxg6+ Kxg6 Qg3+ Kh7 Qg5 Qd2 Qxd2 Nb6 Qf4
>Bd7 Qf7+ Kh8 Qxh5+ Kg7
>
>Yes, bigger programs can be slower. This search would be about 3 to 4 seconds
>on my faster AMD 1400 with 512 MB RAM.
Chess Tiger 14.8 on P2-233MHz 48Mb hash tables finds Nxf7 in 8.29s.
On a fast Athlon I guess it would be within one second?
So at least in the case of Tiger, the new version outperforms the "old" one.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.