Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:30:08 02/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2002 at 23:45:59, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On February 17, 2002 at 15:04:54, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 17, 2002 at 14:17:42, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>>Opposite bishops in a rook endgame are usually considered a boon for the one >>>with an advantage. And also for queen endgames. And note that in rook endgames >>>r+b > r+n unless there are significant structural damage. And Q+N > Q+B. >> >>I heard that opinion about R+B vs R+N and Q+N vs Q+B but based on my experience >>I doubt if it is correct. >> >>I also read in kapablanca's book that positions like the following is a clear >>advantage for white but when I tried comp-comp games I did not get clear >>advantage for white(I am not sure if it is the exact position but the idea is >>clear) > >Which speaks about the weaknesses of the computers in the endgame phase. > >Regards, >Miguel Or about the weakness of the static evaluation of kapablanca. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.