Author: Slater Wold
Date: 22:23:46 02/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2002 at 01:08:49, Uri Blass wrote: >I am not going to repeat my opinion about deep blue here > >only one comment: > >It seems that you assume in this answer that software improvement to have >better search rules than deeper blue are impossible. > >I disagree. > >I believe that a program can search less nodes and be better thanks to better >search rules. > >x nodes of the programs of today are clearly better than x nodes of programs of >1997 and x nodes of programs of 2010 are going to be better than x nodes of >today. > >I believe that part of the improvement is better evaluation function but part of >the improvement is also better search rules. > >Uri I think you're missing one thing: The makers of DB were *NOT* by any means idiots. They actually developed and perfected some of the technics used in todays (top) chess programs. The software side of Deep Blue is *no* worse than the software side of ANY program currently on the market. IMO.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.