Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 15:48:51 02/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2002 at 11:27:04, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >On February 18, 2002 at 09:15:01, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On February 18, 2002 at 08:30:26, karen Dall Lynn wrote: >> >>>Hello >>> >>>Would some of you guys kindly suggest me some interesting links about >>>anti-computer strategies in chess? >>> >>>tks a lot >>>Karen >> >> >>This link should prove useful. >>http://www.angelfire.com/on/anticomputer/index.html >> >>IMO Anti-Comp play may help you win games against machines, but not help you >>improve your game against humans. >> >>So if you're interested in using machines for practise then Anti-Comp. isn't >>the way to train. >> >>But it is a way to get a little revenge;-) >> >>Terry >I disagree with the naive way this is being stated.The best AntiComputer player >in the WORLD JOHN VANDER WEIL was crushed by rebel in a 6 game match at 40/2. Really? He lost, Ed said he really should have won if I'm not mistaken?; but John Vander Weil was certainly not crushed! 3.5-2.5 in favour of Rebel Century 3.0. Also are you certain John Vander Weil is the best at Anti-Comp. play? I think he's very good but I'd lay odds Anand is better!;-) BTW I've beaten Century 3.0 and 4.0 without using anticomputer play, does that make me a GM? No I don't believe so. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.