Author: Tony Werten
Date: 06:01:51 02/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2002 at 08:53:29, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 19, 2002 at 08:39:37, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On February 19, 2002 at 08:33:42, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>12...g6! 13.Bh6 Nxd4 14.Bxf8 Bxf8 15.Qh4 Bc5 16.Rad1 Nd7 17.Qg3 >>> ± (0.78) Depth: 11/33 00:00:58 33368kN >>> >> >>That looks extremely optimistic . It seems now after 15. a4 b4 the compensation >>for black is quite obvious. I liked Junior 7 at move 14 for black which judged >>+0.31 . Now black maybe even has some advantage ? > >the game continued 15.a4 b4 16.Ne2 Nxe2+ 17.Rxe2 and Junior7 believes that it is >a draw based on it's evaluation. Back at the office again :( It seems there's not a whole lot white has left. When I walked back I was thinking v Wely might have choosen the best opening, specially with black. Programs will play for the attack but after giving the exchange the danger is gone while an engine will only see the material plus and go into it instead of keeping the attack going. Tony > >New game - Crafty 18.12 >[D]r2q1bk1/1b3p1p/p3pnp1/3pN3/Pp6/3B3Q/1PP1RPPP/R5K1 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Junior 7: > >17...h5 18.Qe3 > ² (0.59) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >17...h6 18.Qe3 > ² (0.53) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >17...Bg7 18.Qe3 > ² (0.41) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >17...Qc7 18.Qe3 > ² (0.30) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >17...Qc7 18.Qh4 > = (0.18) Depth: 6 00:00:00 >17...Qc7 18.Qh4 > = (0.18) Depth: 9 00:00:00 3kN >17...Qc7 18.Qh4 > = (0.18) Depth: 12 00:00:00 50kN >17...Qc7 18.Rae1 Bg7 19.Nf3 Nd7 20.Qh4 Bxb2 21.Qxb4 > = (0.09) Depth: 14 00:00:06 4492kN >17...Qc7 18.Rd1 Bg7 19.Qh4 Ne4 20.Nf3 h6 21.Qh3 e5 22.Bxe4 > = (-0.01) Depth: 16 00:00:45 27595kN >17...Qc7 18.Qe3 Ne4 19.Ng4 Bc5 20.Qh6 Bf8 > = (0.00) Depth: 18 00:03:46 132180kN > >(Blass, Tel-aviv 19.02.2002) > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.