Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 07:14:17 02/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2002 at 10:02:47, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 19, 2002 at 09:22:41, Tony Werten wrote: > >>On February 19, 2002 at 09:16:22, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 19, 2002 at 09:01:51, Tony Werten wrote: >>> >>>>On February 19, 2002 at 08:53:29, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 19, 2002 at 08:39:37, Peter Berger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 19, 2002 at 08:33:42, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>12...g6! 13.Bh6 Nxd4 14.Bxf8 Bxf8 15.Qh4 Bc5 16.Rad1 Nd7 17.Qg3 >>>>>>> ± (0.78) Depth: 11/33 00:00:58 33368kN >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>That looks extremely optimistic . It seems now after 15. a4 b4 the compensation >>>>>>for black is quite obvious. I liked Junior 7 at move 14 for black which judged >>>>>>+0.31 . Now black maybe even has some advantage ? >>>>> >>>>>the game continued 15.a4 b4 16.Ne2 Nxe2+ 17.Rxe2 and Junior7 believes that it is >>>>>a draw based on it's evaluation. >>>> >>>>Back at the office again :( >>>> >>>>It seems there's not a whole lot white has left. When I walked back I was >>>>thinking v Wely might have choosen the best opening, specially with black. >>>>Programs will play for the attack but after giving the exchange the danger is >>>>gone while an engine will only see the material plus and go into it instead of >>>>keeping the attack going. >>>> >>>>Tony >>> >>>It depends on the engine >>>You can see that Junior does not see the material plus. >> >>Yes, but that's at move 17. The rook was taken at move 14. If it would have seen >>a drawscore (at 14 or earlier) then it might not take the rook, but I think >>that's way too deep. It might even be that after 12. ... g6 there's no way back >>anymore. >> >>Tony > >After g6 Junior does not want to win material and prefers to prevent Nxd4 >by trading knights > >New game - Crafty 18.12 >[D]r2q1rk1/1b2bp1p/p1n1pnp1/1p1pN1B1/3P4/2NB3Q/PPP2PPP/R3R1K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Junior 7: > >13.Nxg6 hxg6 14.Bh6 Nxd4 15.Bxf8 > µ (-0.93) Depth: 3 00:00:07 >13.a4 Nxd4 14.axb5 > ² (0.39) Depth: 3 00:00:07 >13.Nxc6 Bxc6 14.Bh6 > ± (0.76) Depth: 3 00:00:07 >13.Nxc6 Bxc6 14.Bh6 Re8 > ± (1.04) Depth: 6 00:00:07 3kN >13.Nxc6 Bxc6 14.Bh6 Qc7 15.Bxf8 Bxf8 16.Be2 > ± (0.88) Depth: 9 00:00:07 37kN >13.Nxc6 Bxc6 14.Bh6 Re8 15.a4 b4 16.Ne2 Qc7 > ± (0.82) Depth: 12 00:00:07 419kN >13.Nxc6 Bxc6 14.Bh6 Re8 15.a3 Qc7 16.Qf3 Rec8 17.Be2 > ² (0.69) Depth: 15 00:00:17 5783kN >13.Nxc6 Bxc6 14.Bh6 Re8 15.a3 Bf8 16.Be2 Bxh6 17.Qxh6 Qc7 18.h3 > ² (0.64) Depth: 17 00:01:41 50238kN > >(Blass, Tel-aviv 19.02.2002) > >Uri In another 10 moves if there is no progress Van Wely might offer a draw, but I would NOT accepted it if I were the operator of Rebel Century 4, and instead wait for another 10 additional moves to see how Van Wely hold on to his nerves. Whenever a GM offer a draw to a Computer he is at the breaking point with his patience. And just knowing that the program is NOT going to get any more fatigue than him, the GM start worying about making normal human blunder. Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.