Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 12:34:51 02/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2002 at 15:21:14, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 19, 2002 at 14:19:06, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>Rebel Centuy 4 - Loek van Wely >>[D]r5k1/2q2pbp/p1b1p1p1/8/Pp2p3/4N2Q/1PPR1PPP/3R2K1 w - - 0 1 >> >>A wonderfull move.Something unbelievable.A real pawnsac for attack.Worldchampion >>Junior 7 couldn´t attack so strong the gm. >> >>Analysis by Junior 7(Athlon 1,5 Ghz): >> >>23.a5 Lxb2 >> ³ (-0.37) Tiefe: 3 00:00:00 >>23.b3 Tc8 >> = (0.03) Tiefe: 3 00:00:00 >>23.b3 Tc8 24.Dh4 >> = (-0.16) Tiefe: 6 00:00:00 1kN >>23.Dg3 Le5 24.Dh4 Lxb2 25.Td8+ Txd8 26.Txd8+ Kg7 >> = (0.02) Tiefe: 6 00:00:00 5kN >>23.Dg3 Le5 24.Dh4 Lxb2 25.Td8+ Kg7 26.Txa8 Lxa8 27.Dd8 >> = (-0.04) Tiefe: 9 00:00:00 36kN >>23.b3 Lc3 24.Td6 Le5 25.T6d2 Lf4 26.Dh4 >> = (-0.01) Tiefe: 9 00:00:00 52kN >>23.b3 Lc3 24.Dg3 Dxg3 25.Td8+ Txd8 26.Txd8+ Kg7 27.hxg3 Kf6 28.Td6 Lb7 29.Td7 >> = (0.01) Tiefe: 12 00:00:00 341kN >>23.b3 Lf6 24.Dg3 Dxg3 25.hxg3 Kf8 26.Sc4 Lc3 27.Td6 Ld5 28.Td7 Lxc4 >> = (0.09) Tiefe: 15 00:00:04 5005kN >>23.b3 Lf6 24.Dg3 Dxg3 25.hxg3 Kf8 26.Td6 Tc8 27.Sc4 Ke7 28.Kh2 >> = (0.09) Tiefe: 17 00:00:25 26225kN >>23.b3 Lf6 24.Dg3 Dxg3 25.hxg3 Tc8 26.Sc4 Kg7 27.Sd6 Tc7 28.Kh2 Lc3 >> = (0.14) Tiefe: 18 00:02:16 137285kN >>23.b3 Lf6 24.Dg3 Dxg3 25.hxg3 Tc8 26.Sc4 Kf8 27.Td6 Le7 >> = (0.16) Tiefe: 19 00:04:51 289489kN > >It is not about tactics >Junior7 gives the position after 27.Rg8+ smaller score than 0.16 > >I am not sure if Rebel's move is objectively the best move. Is that really the issue here?! Or perhaps, like Lasker, finding a move that creates a lot of problems for the opponent... Sune > >I believe that programs that cannot find it are going to find it if you increase >the material value of the queen in their evaluation. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.