Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: bad anti-computer strategy ?!

Author: ALI MIRAFZALI

Date: 17:19:59 02/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


On February 18, 2002 at 18:40:18, Frank Nelson wrote:

>I tried fireside.anti-computer strategy and got buried by Hiarcs 7.32!
>I used f4-e3-d4-c3 formation only to watch Hiarcs open it up like a knife
>to a watermelon. I had a book once which said that studying the games of
>David Bronstein vs. computers was the right direction for anti-computers.
>I think that a person has to use his own common sense when playing against a
>computer. Computers don't get tired unless they are running on batteries
>and is usually good at forcing a desirable tactical variation. I think that most
>people play well when the opening is over then start to tire move-by-move and
>then blunder in a level position. The computer of course then take the
>initiative until it leads to a + - ! If anyone have some original anti-computer
>strategy please post to this CCC newsgroup. Thanks in advance.
>
>Ljubomir Nelson
Given the strength of current programs there is no such thing anymore.Rebel is
eating VanWely alive .Maybe this was true 10 years.If you are not a GM you
dont have a chance against a program



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.